Mental health patients at Rampton Secure Hospital in the UK are facing a ban on smoking effective on July 1st 2008, and this is driving them mad. The ban was initiated by Nottinghamshire Health Care NHS Trust, implementing a law prohibiting smoking in all enclosed public places. The move is being criticized for violation of human rights that could further destabilize the mentally unstable by withdrawing their coping mechanism. Smoking is a vital crutch of 70% of mental health patients. Removing this would create a serious imbalance and exacerbate their distressed conditions. In a sense, the ban will make them healthier to live longer, but the added imbalance would lead them to commit suicide.
The irony is that prisons are exempt from the ban. Mental health patients cannot even walk outside the yard to smoke while prisoners can smoke in and out of their cells. One is for treatment while the other is for punishment, yet the mentally unstable will endure more punishment in the process. Both prison and hospital institutions are homes where patients and inmates live. It therefore violates their right to privacy and family life. There is something about the logic of the ban and its implementation in public enclosed locations that does not distinguish a temporary transient stay from several months or years of confinement. Even in the aspect of confinement, its narrow view of hospital is discriminatory from the general idea of prison detention. It's insane!
The concept of health care in general hospitals where smoking is banned is different in a mental health institution. Here, what is being addressed is mental stability,
The irony is that prisons are exempt from the ban. Mental health patients cannot even walk outside the yard to smoke while prisoners can smoke in and out of their cells. One is for treatment while the other is for punishment, yet the mentally unstable will endure more punishment in the process. Both prison and hospital institutions are homes where patients and inmates live. It therefore violates their right to privacy and family life. There is something about the logic of the ban and its implementation in public enclosed locations that does not distinguish a temporary transient stay from several months or years of confinement. Even in the aspect of confinement, its narrow view of hospital is discriminatory from the general idea of prison detention. It's insane!
The concept of health care in general hospitals where smoking is banned is different in a mental health institution. Here, what is being addressed is mental stability,
and smoking provides that, at least for short periods. Similar to the medication these hospitals provide, some are for stress attacks that could stabilize patients for the time being. Apparently, the implementors are losing their minds about imposing a smoking ban in their hospitals. They even announced assistance to help smoking patients to quit. How very thoughtful. Patients will file cases in court, but their disadvantage would be the believability of their testimony. They can perhaps select an "eccentric judge" to hear their plea, but the hospital lawyers may protest and have the judge confined with the patients. There he can hear their case for an extended period. It's not a win situation. What do these hospital health care authorities expect the mental patients to do, go crazy?
Haaarrrwwwwk...Twoooooph...Ting!
Haaarrrwwwwk...Twoooooph...Ting!